Where exactly do you people come up with this horse manure?Having sex outside of marriage is not exactly up to standards...
Yes
No
Where exactly do you people come up with this horse manure?Having sex outside of marriage is not exactly up to standards...
Monogomy is also a concept man invented. if we were to goOriginally posted by RoD
Thats a really lame statement. Sex outside of marrige IS the standard in my opinion. Would we be here today if our ancestors, such as cavemen, insisted on marrige before reproduction? No. Nature holds no standard for sex except that its ok to do it. Marrige is something man himself invented, and is not a standard but rather a choice some make. A choice that should i not make doesnt put me outside the standard, but into the norm where we all used to be. :grunt: :grunt:
strictly by the standards of nature, then you should find nothing
wrong with cheating on your girlfriend -- and she should find
nothing with with cheating on you. Remember this when she
tells you that she's pregnant with someone else's child.
Protected Sex is another concept that man invented. If you're
going to use nature as reasoning for your skankiness, then you
should also keep in mind that nature's intent with that skankiness
is procreation; Everytime you put on a condom, you're going
against nature.
Our ancestors were cavemen! You just said that! Why do you want
to compare yourself to a caveman? That's what I'm talking about
when I bring up the whole "evolution" issue.
But anyway, my stance has nothing to with marriage. It has to
do with thinking that people who've had a lot of partners are
extremely gross; sloppy, smelly, spider-egg infested disease
bags.
Staying away from General.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.Monogomy is also a concept man invented. if we were to go
strictly by the standards of nature, then you should find nothing
wrong with cheating on your girlfriend -- and she should find
nothing with with cheating on you. Remember this when she
tells you that she's pregnant with someone else's child
The reason you object to your girlfriend cheating on you is because it means you might end up raising a child that's not yours, which from an evolutionary perspective is absolute disaster.
The reason that your girlfriend objects to you cheating is that it means you might end up caring and hence providing less for her and her offspring, which makes her kids less likely to survive.
Its all "strictly the standards of nature".
The argument that sex before mariage is "bad", is absurd, and harks back to earlier days where marriage had religious connotations, and sex was an evil dirty thing that you went to hell for.
The only significant evolution that has occured in the last 10000 years is social and cultural evolution, it is this cultural evolution that has resulted in todays hedonistic lifestyle where sex is *gasp* no longer confined to people making life-long commitments.Our ancestors were cavemen! You just said that! Why do you want
to compare yourself to a caveman? That's what I'm talking about
when I bring up the whole "evolution" issue.
Last edited by Clyde; 07-20-2003 at 03:51 PM.
Free love and sex for everyone! Just like the 60s
I would marry someone who was not a virgin, but the reasons these morons have been giving for doing so are horrible. Most of you seem to be depraved individuals. Oh well, some day in the not too distant future, you'll be happy - dosed up on soma, working daily with the other members of your bokanovsky group, coming home and having sex with the freemartin of the day.
When did morality die? I see very little trace of it here.
Away.
Morality never died, it just 'evolved', as it has been doing since it started.When did morality die? I see very little trace of it here.
Morality is not a set of laws etched into that fabric of the universe it is merely a set of checks and balances that keeps a society together. It changes as society changes.
Actually, no. I'm right (except when I misspelled monogamy).Originally posted by Clyde
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
>The reason you object to your girlfriend cheating on you is
>because it means you might end up raising a child that's not
>yours, which from an evolutionary perspective is absolute
>disaster.
That's not an issue among humans. We have DNA tests. That's
not even an issue among animals, because they don't care
about such things.
Monogamy is the result of evolution. The practice that you want
to abide by is typical of what occurs among animals more often:
extra-pair copulation.
>It changes as society changes.
Which is terrible, because as more of you sink lower and lower
into a world of skankishness, you bring down the morality
standards that future generations should try to abide by. The
world is disgusting.
The future is going to be extremely sleazy, and you're the type
of person that's responsible for it. It's sad that you actually
represent the majority. You want drugs easily available, multiple
sexual partners; you want everything that'll lead to instant
gratification socially accepted. It's a destructive and dangerous
way to live.
Staying away from General.
>> You want drugs easily available, multiple
sexual partners; you want everything that'll lead to instant
gratification socially accepted.
Yes, yes and....er...yeah why not!
Especially the drugs :PYou want drugs easily available, multiple
sexual partners; you want everything that'll lead to instant
gratification socially accepted.
Ethic, you're bitter only because you can't get any. What a nice excuse to come up--saying that you believe sex shouldn't take place until marriage. In your case you obviously only believe that because as stated above, you can't get any. Whereas others may wait because of cultural or religious reasons. You wait well because simply you have no other choice but to wait. Oh, yes, and wait you will for a very long time.
Actually, I agree with Ethic. And it's not because I can't have sex. I'm only thirteen, and having sex doesn't matter much to me. It might just be my religion that makes me believe that, but the standards are lowering rapidly. Back a century ago, you probably would be exiled for having sex outside of marriage.
I've turned down several girls that would be more than willing, and actually made the suggestion.
What do you say to that Techwins?
Away.
IMO (hehe internet slang!) there probably aren't many women out of college that aren't a virgin. (Probably wrong though). Wouldn't it be better to have someone that is experienced? I read somewhere that a good sex life is almost a key to a marrage.
"When I die I want to pass peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car."
IM(and many others)HO(more net slang) sex is something that should be done between a husband and wife, but the standards these days are different. I'm LDS and we are against immorality.
Okay, you are not depraved... you are plain stupid. What better did you have to do to turn down a hot girl ?I've turned down several girls that would be more than willing, and actually made the suggestion.
hth
-nv
She was so Blonde, she spent 20 minutes looking at the orange juice can because it said "Concentrate."
When in doubt, read the FAQ.
Then ask a smart question.
who says they were hot :P
