Thread: oh god, not another linux thread...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    465

    oh god, not another linux thread...

    ok, let me begin by saying i do not know

    S.Q.U.A.T.

    about linux, nor unix, nor any of its siblings.


    with that out of the way, i have been instructed to format one of our shop computers, install linux, and set it up as a webserver.

    my first question is: what is the best version of linux, and where can i get it?

    second, how do i go about installing it and setting it up, and what are some of the things to be watchful of when installing and setting up?

    third, i know about as much about making webservers as i do about linux itself.


    we already have redhat 6.0 on a CD here at the shop, and my boss is wanting to use that one for various reasons. he wants to stick with redhat because it is probably the most popular version of linux, and he has already paid for this version of it (came with a book) so we have some referance for support.


    any help would be greatly appreciated.
    I came up with a cool phrase to put down here, but i forgot it...

  2. #2
    Unregistered Leeman_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    753
    How about you plop the CD into the CD-ROM drive, restart computer, hit F2 while it's booting up, go over to the Boot tab, set the boot order to start with your CD-ROM drive, and follow the instructions.

    With Red Hat it's REALLY easy. There is even an install class that's called "Server".

  3. #3
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,823
    > With Red Hat it's REALLY easy.

    Yeah, ... (I just realized how much I unintentionally say your name), just look at how successful leeman's been!

  4. #4
    Registered User codingmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    309
    Best Linux:

    personal usage: Redhat, Mandrake (both simple to install)

    Server: Gentoo, Slackware (Gentoo: extreme hard installation for newbies, Slackware -> hard installation)

    Server: (High Security) Debian (hard installation)


    Best Webserver: Apache (normal installation, easy to config)
    Supports lots of modules: PHP, Perl, mod_ASP, mysql, mod_ssl.....


    www.isolinux.org (ISO images)
    www.redhat.com
    www.gentoo.org
    www.mandrake.com
    www.slackware.org
    www.debian.org
    www.linux.org
    http://www.linuxnewbie.org/

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    465
    thanks guys, im formatting now.

    wish me luck.
    I came up with a cool phrase to put down here, but i forgot it...

  6. #6
    Registered User Vber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    807

    ...

    personal usage: Redhat, Mandrake (both simple to install)
    Not exactly correct, Mandrake is better for noobs, and you forgot to add the most used distro in Europe, SuSE, and it's great for noobs too, and I still think, Mdk beats Rh. And Slackware is perfectly well for personal use too, not too difficult installation.



    Server: Gentoo, Slackware (Gentoo: extreme hard installation for newbies, Slackware -> hard installation)
    Gentoo, indeed, extremely difficult installation (for noobs), and dont worth all this, and just like I said, slackware installation, it's not so difficult.



    Supports lots of modules: PHP, Perl, mod_ASP, mysql, mod_ssl.....
    Mod Asp, sucks, no because it's asp, but the support is poor, really poor.

    Juse like you said, a respected distro and really high security, support, packages, open-source, go to Debian, just, perfect.

  7. #7
    Registered User codingmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    309
    @Vber
    right...


    SuSE SUCKZ

    SuSE=no security, stupid, can't describe, it's a real ****ty distrobo

    I don't like it!

  8. #8
    Registered User Vber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    807

    ...

    SuSE, sucks?
    Ohh, I guess you're talking without any experience with it.
    Funny, most of home-users (europe), use SuSE as their OS, it's great of noobs, nice gui, easy installation, really good support, what more you want from an distro, that should be to noob-users? You cannot expect that SuSE should be an Debian or Slack from the life...

  9. #9
    Registered User codingmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    309
    I've worked 2 moths with SuSE and it still sucks.
    Now I'm working with Redhat and Debian, sometimes with Mandrake.

    But SuSE suckz!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    SuSE is like void main(void)

  10. #10
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,823
    Originally posted by codingmaster
    @Vber
    right...


    SuSE SUCKZ

    SuSE=no security, stupid, can't describe, it's a real ****ty distrobo

    I don't like it!
    You have anger management problems. I suggest a relaxing massage or a short vacation.

  11. #11
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    does anyone stfw or at least the boards anymore.....or at least not post something thats been discussed for almost a week straight in 300 different topics?

  12. #12
    Registered User Vber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    807

    Ok..

    As a 4 years unix user, I'am telling you that SuSE for personal use, it's one of the best distros, you can think whatever you want, and I respect that

    Hmm, my opinion:
    Best distro for server: Debian if we're talking about Linux, and AIX if we're talking about *nix.

    Best desktop distro: Linux Slackware or Linux Mandrake.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,212
    I'm no expert, but in the field of servers it seems:
    FreeBSD > Linux

  14. #14
    Registered User Vber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    807

    ...

    Originally posted by Brian
    I'm no expert, but in the field of servers it seems:
    FreeBSD > Linux
    If we're talking about *nix, I suggest for servers AIX or CiSCO, this two *nix, are superb for servers.

    And be sure, FreeBSD against an Debian well configurated by an experient admin, it's the same thing or still, debian is better.

    But Linxu against AIX or CISCO in security, it's nothing
    You can see this in zone-h.
    Last edited by Vber; 01-25-2003 at 05:47 AM.

  15. #15
    Registered User foniks munkee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    343
    FreeBSD > Linux
    Agreed - it is probably not ideal for a beginner though, and it is probable that you will be able to get greater support for Linux.

    Incidently, when I first started running FreeBSD at work, it used to be able to outperform Linux running Linux apps in Linux emulation mode. It has a far supperior memory management system than Linux which is probably why it is favoured for server applications.
    "Queen and huntress, chaste and fair,
    Now the sun is laid to sleep,
    Seated in thy silver chair,
    State in wonted manner keep."

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Help with ucontext (linux)
    By jcafaro10 in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 09:03 PM
  2. Terminating secondary thread from another thread
    By wssoh85 in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 05:14 AM
  3. Win32 Thread Object Model Revisted
    By Codeplug in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-15-2004, 08:50 AM
  4. what race is god?
    By Leeman_s in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-22-2004, 05:38 PM
  5. How to make a thread sleep or std::recv timeout?
    By BrianK in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-26-2003, 10:27 PM