View Poll Results: Who was first, the hen or the egg

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • The egg

    10 29.41%
  • The hen

    7 20.59%
  • Both

    2 5.88%
  • The eggnog

    15 44.12%

Thread: The hen or the egg?

  1. #31
    Unregd
    Guest
    Hk_mp5kpdw, species designations are kind of arbitrary. You cannot make a cut-off point between the parents and children and say on one side they are ancestral species A and on the other descendant species B. Species distinguish themselves over several generations.

    An analogy is that you cannot make a clean cut-off point between Vulgar Latin/Romance and Old French, Old Spanish, etc. It's another case of a slow build up of change over time.

    Okay, now for my answer to the question: The chicken came at the same time as the chicken egg because the egg is a developing chicken!

  2. #32
    Me -=SoKrA=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    448
    Originally posted by Unregd
    The chicken came at the same time as the chicken egg because the egg is a developing chicken!
    Not really, the egg is what sorrounds the chicken. That would be like saying 'the woumb is a developing child'. I see your point but the egg is actually created a few days before it's actually layd. The egg was created before it was fertilised. So egg.
    SoKrA-BTS "Judge not the program I made, but the one I've yet to code"
    I say what I say, I mean what I mean.
    IDE: emacs + make + gcc and proud of it.

  3. #33
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,829
    >>> the egg is what sorrounds the chicken.

    Not really, the egg is an unfertilised female cell. It starts to become a chicken when it is fertilised by a male cell, when this happens, the female cell absorbs the head of the male cell and the resulting cell is now destined to be a chicken, this cell divides many times as it grows, and shortly before the develping embryo is "laid, it is encapsulated in the hard egg shell.

    Thus, the egg shell surrounds the chicken. The egg and the developing chicken embryo are one and the same.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

  4. #34
    Me -=SoKrA=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    448
    Oh, I forgot the egg was a single cell. Anyhow, the unfertilised cell is still considered an egg. I was thinking about the developing chicken feeding on the egg and got all mixed up.
    SoKrA-BTS "Judge not the program I made, but the one I've yet to code"
    I say what I say, I mean what I mean.
    IDE: emacs + make + gcc and proud of it.

  5. #35
    Much older and wiser Fountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Engeeeerland
    Posts
    1,158
    Is eggnog not alcoholic-like another name for advocat? Or something
    Such is life.

  6. #36
    Registered User GoodStuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    65

    You are all incorrect because...

    It is obvious that an egg cannot hatch itself. It is equally obvious that a chicken needs an egg to hatch from.

    Therefore, what happened can be one of two things:

    A. A time machine in the future was used to place two fully mature chickens (male/female) into the past. From there came chickens and eggs. Its seems that they come from nowhere then. This idea may seem strange, but seen in the light of time traveling, is quite normal. Where the began before the time loop was established is immaterial, for once the time loop has been established, the time-space continium has altered to erase that start.

    B. God created chickens and eggs simultaniously.

    Therefore, by Occam's Razor, I declare B the simpler theorem. This does presuppose that the is a God, but I have seen His works personally, therefore I have no problem in beleiving in Him.

    That's all folks !

    Gustav

  7. #37
    Bios Raider biosninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    765
    hold it there buddy

    where did the chickens come from that they sent "Back in time" through the "time machine"?

    They didn't just "appear"
    The knack of flying is learning to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

  8. #38
    Registered User GoodStuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    65

    It doesn't matter where they came from...

    It works like this.

    Someone invents a time machine. Then he builds that time machine. Then he sends back the plans FOR the time machine BEFORE he invented it. Then he never has to invent the time machine. See ?

    The same happens with the egg/chickens.

    The chickens/eggs came from somewhere, doesn't matter where/how/when. Then, someone in the future sent them back in time. A time loop is created, and suddenly chickens and eggs don't NEED to come from somewhere. They come from the future. See ? Simple as that.

    Gustav

  9. #39
    Bios Raider biosninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    765
    The chickens/eggs came from somewhere, doesn't matter where/how/when
    Bu it does matter!!!! Things just don't appear!!!
    The knack of flying is learning to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

  10. #40
    Registered User GoodStuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    65

    Oh, but they do !

    Things DO just appear. Especially if you have a time machine.

    Things DISSAPEAR just as often. How many times have you lost small pens, trinkets, keys, that just had no POSSIBLE way to go anywhere? THEY all dissapear to the nearest Bermuda triangle. I'm convinced that if you created a small Bermuda triangle on your desk, for instance, that it would attract all the local time-space related dissapearances in the neighbourhood. You'd have so many pens and keys and stuff, you'd not know what to DO with them!

    Now hush up. As I said, God made the chickens and the eggs. You can ask him one day when you meet him.

    Gustav

  11. #41
    Bios Raider biosninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    765
    Well, this is going nowere. Doen't look like either of our oppinions can be changed.

    We'll just have to accept it.

    THERE IS NO ANSWER!!
    The knack of flying is learning to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

  12. #42
    Registered User GoodStuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    65

    But I'm right !

    You have set forth no logical hypothesis of your own. Instead you have sniped uselessly at mine in a futile attempt to prove me wrong.

    Get your own #@$@# hypothesis and leave mine alone!

    I hereby declare myself right.

    If you like, you are hereby declared right as well.

    So there.

    Gustav
    (Muhahaha)

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 05:22 PM
  2. Battle sequence easter egg not working!
    By DarkAlex in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-01-2007, 05:17 PM
  3. The Egg Suicide Machine!!!
    By deathstryke in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2003, 11:25 AM
  4. Chicken or the Egg problem...
    By Imperito in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2002, 06:22 AM
  5. Chicken Or The Egg
    By gnu-ehacks in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-27-2001, 08:30 PM