Translated from quran: (not manipulated by me)
Jihad - an act of war against non muslims for the propagation of islam.
there are 3 such wars, and the 3rd war will bring the whole world
under the rule of the great shariya law, the law of islam.
Ghazi - the honorary name given to a muslim when he kills a non muslim
Last edited by moonwalker; 08-22-2002 at 09:32 PM.
FYI, I provided a link to the human rights website that provesOriginally posted by golfinguy4
Moonwalker, troll_king was just trying to get a rise out of you.
Govt. was kidding around about the hindus. He was making a point. You mentioned the drug cases, but provided no facts. He did the same thing in a sarcastic manner.
Jeez, some people need to chill out.
what i said.
Just wanted to say,
India was not the first country to gain independence without a war. India lost the war of independence (often called the Sepoy Riots) in 1857.
India gained independence in 1947, I don't know which country was first (without a war) but Australia federated in 1901 (without a war).
On the 'blacks' in prison;
Australian Aborigines are ~3% of the population but closer to 25% of the prison population.
This either (depending on your point of view) means Australian Aborigines commit more crimes OR Australian Aborigines are treated more hashly by the courts than non Aborigines.
Kashmir is (was, I was there nearly two decades ago) one of the most beautiful places on earth.
"Man alone suffers so excruciatingly in the world that he was compelled to invent laughter."
Friedrich Nietzsche
"I spent a lot of my money on booze, birds and fast cars......the rest I squandered."
George Best
"If you are going through hell....keep going."
Winston Churchill
I am a muslim and I have no idea where did you get this translation from because I never heard of it.Originally posted by moonwalker
Translated from quran: (not manipulated by me)
Jihad - an act of war against non muslims for the propagation of islam.
there are 3 such wars, and the 3rd war will bring the whole world
under the rule of the great shariya law, the law of islam.
Ghazi - the honorary name given to a muslim when he kills a non muslim
If you want to know anything about Islam go to this site http://english.islamway.com/
If you want the translation of the Holy Qur'an go here http://english.islamway.com/sindex.p...=erecitorslist
I am an Indian here... Isee a lot of so called kashmiri experts here.. one saying he know more than the other and the other saying it is a game of tit for tat.. Well i say let all the world leaders shut their ass and leave us alone to settle our issue for once for all.......
The world tells us to talk peace.. but amerioca jumps to war why did it not talk peace with Osama...
Every time there was a war like situation.. India sent home pakistan officials with honour requesting them politely but pakistan always arrested indian officials from the Indian embasy in pakistan and sent them home with broken legs and hands... How i wish this onece happens to American officials..(America will instantly jump to war and preach peace to everyone..)
It looks like America is more comfortable with a fundamental dictatorship country than with the worlds largest democracy... Well i ask god to put all American ass in pakistan for a month before they talk....
That's really funny. Did you read that back to yourself before you posted that?Well i say let all the world leaders shut their ass and leave us alone to settle our issue for once for all.......I am sure the leaders of the world are just as tired of dealing with you people.
Who says we didn't? You? Are you a member of my goverment? No. So now who's the "expert"?The world tells us to talk peace.. but amerioca jumps to war why did it not talk peace with Osama...
You think we would talk peace if that happened? Your really naive.How i wish this onece happens to American officials..(America will instantly jump to war and preach peace to everyone..)
Again. Did you really put any form of intelligent thought into this post?It looks like America is more comfortable with a fundamental dictatorship country than with the worlds largest democracy...
You haven't contributed to this discussion. My suggestion to you is to think and rethink your posting. Have your parents read it over for you if you need help. Good Luck.Well i ask god to put all American ass in pakistan for a month before they talk....
//That's really funny. Did you read that back to yourself before you posted that? I am sure the leaders of the world are just as tired of dealing with you people
Then why do you want to poke your nose into our business
//Who says we didn't? You? Are you a member of my goverment? No. So now who's the "expert"?
The usual american double talk
//You think we would talk peace if that happened? Your really naive
Always thinks it is above others...(but dosent knoe a damm abiut anytin else outside US)
well what do you know abot the issue.. you just get your news from CNN and you talk all kind of bull ****.. So u better ask your moma to get you some history books.....
Maybe you didn't read his post properly.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How i wish this onece happens to American officials..(America will instantly jump to war and preach peace to everyone..)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You think we would talk peace if that happened? Your really naive.
This is what Vasanth said:
following the above... he then saidEvery time there was a war like situation.. India sent home pakistan officials with honour requesting them politely but pakistan always arrested indian officials from the Indian embasy in pakistan and sent them home with broken legs and hands...
He's not being naive. He's giving an example of how americaHow i wish this onece happens to American officials..(America will instantly jump to war and preach peace to everyone..)
blindly talks about the so called "peace".. and trying to
explain how america would react if the same things happen
to it.
no, i am not trying to flame DISGUISED in this post..
i retired from this conversation yesterday.
Last edited by moonwalker; 08-23-2002 at 11:45 AM.
Maybe it's because both countries aren't rational enough to deal with the situation without moderation. It's not just America you know. What do you think would happen when your radiation clouds begin to kill off people from other nations? You think you have problems now?Then why do you want to poke your nose into our business
Sure it is. Actually I was making a point. You must have missed it.The usual american double talk
I won't even respond to that because I am not going to be able to convince you otherwise.Always thinks it is above others...(but dosent knoe a damm abiut anytin else outside US)
I never claimed to be an expert on this subject but I find CNN to be very entertaining. I don't know what I said that you consider Bull**** but you have the right to your opinions. On this board at least. And I don't care to read about the history of your country. I just don't find interesting although, I am a big fan of your architecture.well what do you know abot the issue.. you just get your news from CNN and you talk all kind of bull ****.. So u better ask your moma to get you some history books.....
I agreed with the jumping to war part because that's what would happen but we wouldn't be preaching peace in that situation and that's what I thought he was a little naive about.He's not being naive. He's giving an example of how america
blindly talks about the so called "peace".. and trying to
explain how america would react if the same things happen
to it.
Thank you and I think I will join you by exiting this thread now because it seems to have lost any sense of a point.no, i am not trying to flame DISGUISED in this post..
i retired from this conversation yesterday
Vasanth, you do realize that when you drop a nuke, the radiation spreads over the entire world. This makes it the entire world's problem.
i would really want to point out again :
the country that threatened to use a nuke was pakistan
NOT india.
it is because it is afraid that it would lose a conventional
war (i already said this in the first few posts) with India.
Here's yahoo news:
http://in.news.yahoo.com/020530/20/1p549.html
This is same as.... if US and Mexico were nuclear rivals, for
example (thank god it's not the case)
it's like Mexico saying... as we can't fight against US with
a conventional war, whenever US strikes us even with
conventional fighter planes/etc, we're going to protect
ourselves with a nuke.... and getting away with it...
(this is also called Nuclear Blackmail)
Last edited by moonwalker; 08-23-2002 at 05:52 PM.
Moonwalker
>>if US and Mexico were nuclear rivals,
try US and Cuba and remember the 'Bay of Pigs' crisis.
DISGUISED
>>And I don't care to read about the history of your country.
But you feel qualified to comment.
>>I just don't find interesting although, I am a big fan of your architecture.
Doesn't this prove vasanth's point?
"(but dosent knoe a damm abiut anytin else outside US)"
or doesn't it count if you can't be bothered to become informed (before you enter the discussion)?
"Man alone suffers so excruciatingly in the world that he was compelled to invent laughter."
Friedrich Nietzsche
"I spent a lot of my money on booze, birds and fast cars......the rest I squandered."
George Best
"If you are going through hell....keep going."
Winston Churchill
Well this i smy last reply in this thread i guess....(it is useless talking...)
and i am sorry for being harsh in my last posts..
Well we never said we will drop the nukes or even we will use them... It is only pakistan saying that... So in case Mexico says that they will nuke you will America talk peace.. The is making India a scape goat which it is not ready to accept..
>>But you feel qualified to comment.<<
Of course, this was intended to be a discussion of current events not history.
>>Doesn't this prove vasanth's point?
"(but dosent knoe a damm abiut anytin else outside US)"
or doesn't it count if you can't be bothered to become informed (before you enter the discussion)?
<<
No, it doesn't, because I know enough about this particular situation. That doesn't mean I need to know everything about the history of the nation. I actually do know quite a bit about India's history. By saying that I just meant that I don't care to study it any further so my mother purchasing me a book wouldn't be necessary
What do we really know about these things? Why not debate about the true reason for wars fought 10000 years ago. The effect would be the same. The truth is this, human beings are:
1) aggressive
2) ignorant
3) narrow-minded
4) confused
5) hypocritical
6) unstable
What is the debate about then? I'm sorry if I sound simplistic, but in my opinion, nothing is new under the sun. As long as there are beings with conflicting desires, there will be turmoil, hatred, and wars. National officials are just human beings. Do you not argue and fight? Theirs is no different from your or my own tendencies. Even if there were only two people on this planet there would be the threat of war and control. It is the nature of man. Like it or leave it.
Code:#include <cmath> #include <complex> bool euler_flip(bool value) { return std::pow ( std::complex<float>(std::exp(1.0)), std::complex<float>(0, 1) * std::complex<float>(std::atan(1.0) *(1 << (value + 2))) ).real() < 0; }
