i'm also just being sarcastic too, cause template support sucked in MSVC to the point i just gave it up.
i'm also just being sarcastic too, cause template support sucked in MSVC to the point i just gave it up.
ADVISORY: This users posts are rated CP-MA, for Mature Audiences only.
In what ways did it suck? Anything in particular it didn't support or work with? I haven't really used the templates and MSVC that much. I rather use gcc when I do that stuff.
fist they were impossible to get working for someone trying to learn(keep in mind i was new to them and C++ about 2+ years ago, so all i have are bad memories), all kinds of internal compiler errors, virtually none error messages associated with templates are defined, so when you get a compiler error, you have no help and you have no clues as to whats causing it you or something else, the only thing they work on is simple stuff...then they're fine but man don't try anything big.
besides that even Bjarne Stroustrup said the template support in VC was lacking
::edit:: a lot of repressed memories...hehe
Last edited by no-one; 04-26-2002 at 06:43 PM.
ADVISORY: This users posts are rated CP-MA, for Mature Audiences only.
No what I was saying is that the implementation of the STL used in the C++.NET is a lot better than what MSVC 6 had.
"only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and im not sure about the former." - albert einstein
