Thread: Is learning C/C++ worth it?

Originally Posted by Elysia

That is what I figured. If you are used to C++, you would get frustrated with the lack of tools and libraries.
If you were used to C, you would likely try to implement everything yourself using low-level code.
It takes a while to get used to the change!

But the best way is if you're used to both! Then you use a library, if there is some that fits you, otherwise you implement one of your own (instead of getting frustrated).

Originally Posted by maxorator

But the best way is if you're used to both! Then you use a library, if there is some that fits you, otherwise you implement one of your own (instead of getting frustrated).

Aye, no arguments there. I am kindof like that myself. Like to implement my own stuff.

It's C-style C++. Not worthless, but not ideal. If you want to learn modern C++ you'll have to get another book. If getting another book will be difficult, then this one is fine. Just remember that you'll need to adjust your learning to account for the difference.

For example, if you stick with the 3rd edition then come on to the forum and ask a question about why this isn't working:

Code:

char word[] = "hello";
char input[10];
cin >> input;
if (input == word)

you'll be told that you can't use == with C style strings and that you should be using C++ strings instead. I don't know if the third edition talks about C++ strings, but if it doesn't you'll have to go look them up outside of your book. The same thing will happen quite a few times. You'll still end up learning, just not quite as smoothly as you could.

Is vector mentioned in the index at all? If not, then you'll be having to do a lot of research outside the book, and you'll probably end up buying a second book anyway.

Originally Posted by C/C++ Learner

Hmm, haven't seen vectors in my book, that's a negative.
Anyway, by pure chance I downloaded vector tutorials the day I learned basic C++.
I'm going to read the book, and after that I'll read some other books I can get my hands on, hopefully, I can get the C++ Primer,
although I'm having trouble finding Accelerated C++.

What do you think about this:

The C++ Standard Library: A Tutorial and Reference

That's more of a reference, or an intermediate tutorial (like someone transitioning). Meaning it assumes you are comfortable with C++ and just teaches you STL. It's not that hard finding e-books (wink wink - buy them if you like them). I really liked Accelerated C++, but I haven't looked into C++ How to Program (latest edition might be better, I don't know).

Originally Posted by abachler

Nope, looking at a copy of the proposed standard (yeah im that old) now, vector isnt part of it.

Maybe you're looking at too old a copy of the proposed standard.

vector is in the actual standard, and also in the 1997 final public draft, which is available for free:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/open/n2356/