Thread: Broadband Speed?

  1. #16

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,042
    I've found that the only way to effectively deal with my internet problems is to kill myself.






    I'm not immature, I'm refined in the opposite direction.

  2. #17
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    hmm... maybe my question was too difficult.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  3. #18
    Lurking whiteflags's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,612
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    hmm... maybe my question was too difficult.
    Pick the one that matches your upspeed and downspeed the closest. Web services and stuff like proxies may also have to configure itself to upload your items to the internet in the most economical way.

    And modem potential is better advertising, but if nobody else was sharing your bandwidth, you would be going that fast.
    Last edited by whiteflags; 04-08-2008 at 02:50 PM.

  4. #19
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Hard to do since these ADSL connections are asymmetric and my upload speeds are less than half the donwnload speed. I'm just not used to them since I've always used symmetric cable modem connections and only recently switched to ADSL.

    But I guess it's most of the time asking about download speeds, unless i'm configuring something that will act as a server... thanks.

    What about this thing with ISP announcing I have a 12Mb ADSL when my speed is in fact 500Kb/200Kb? I see this everywhere. Not just with my ISP.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  5. #20
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Out of scope
    Posts
    4,079
    Usually Mario, when they ask you for that speed, they're looking for your downspeed. By the way, most Cable internet (if not all) is asymmetric as far as I know... just look at my down speeds and up speeds.
    Sent from my iPadŽ

  6. #21
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by SlyMaelstrom View Post
    By the way, most Cable internet (if not all) is asymmetric as far as I know... just look at my down speeds and up speeds.
    They are indeed. But only marginally when compared to ADSL which has an usual ratio of 2:1 in favor of downstream. Cable modem have rather more close ratios of 1.3:1 and even 1.2:1
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  7. #22
    Kernel hacker
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Farncombe, Surrey, England
    Posts
    15,677
    Or even 6:1 (1779:311 measured, I think the official number is 2MB/512KB which is 4:1)

    --
    Mats
    Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
    Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.

  8. #23
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Out of scope
    Posts
    4,079
    Mine is nearly 23:2.
    Sent from my iPadŽ

  9. #24
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Different experiences then. I've ran through two version of DOCSIS; 2.0 and 3.0, during about 7 years of cable access. Both offering very close ratios.

    Maybe an european thing... or specific to this country service. Even though the same was true of my Australian experience - I believe DOCSIS 2.0.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  10. #25
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Out of scope
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    Different experiences then. I've ran through two version of DOCSIS; 2.0 and 3.0, during about 7 years of cable access. Both offering very close ratios.

    Maybe an european thing... or specific to this country service. Even though the same was true of my Australian experience - I believe DOCSIS 2.0.
    It's hard to say with cable, but it's quite possible that they are throttling it the same way the throttle the up-speed on FIOS in the US. I know for a fact that with the same line, Verizon can offer either 15d/2u or 15d/15u for different prices.
    Sent from my iPadŽ

  11. #26
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by SlyMaelstrom View Post
    It's hard to say with cable, but it's quite possible that they are throttling it the same way the throttle the up-speed on FIOS in the US. I know for a fact that with the same line, Verizon can offer either 15d/2u or 15d/15u for different prices.
    Actually you just reminded me of an important thing... I've always requested for static ip access. That almost surely explains it. Hmm...
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  12. #27
    l'Anziano DavidP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Plano, Texas, United States
    Posts
    2,743
    Weeeeee....I scored quite well.

    http://www.speedtest.net/result/257046236.png
    My Website

    "Circular logic is good because it is."

  13. #28
    Officially An Architect brewbuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    7,396
    Quote Originally Posted by DavidP View Post
    Weeeeee....I scored quite well.

    http://www.speedtest.net/result/257046236.png
    Oh yeah?!?!

    http://www.speedtest.net/result/257060781.png

    17 Mbps is... somewhat more than I used to get. When I started using computer networks, I used a 2400 bps modem.

    It's actually funny how I don't really notice a difference in speed of almost 7400 times. Gives you an idea of how much "bloat" is inherent in the Internet. 2400 bps used to be juuust fine. Then again, I wasn't downloading videos or music like everybody does today.

    (I'm not trying to sound old -- just got started early )

  14. #29
    Malum in se abachler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,195
    Quote Originally Posted by brewbuck View Post
    When I started using computer networks, I used a 2400 bps modem.
    Had to get the Ma Bell's permission to hook up my 300

  15. #30
    Frequently Quite Prolix dwks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,057
    Okay, this is just weird. My upload speed (6798 kb/s) is over four times faster than my download speed (1684 kb/s)!

    (In case anyone's wondering how a dial-up user got such high values: this isn't my connection. It's a public wireless one.)
    Last edited by dwks; 04-09-2008 at 02:54 PM. Reason: Swapped speeds around
    dwk

    Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.

    "Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
    "Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
    "The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell


    Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
    Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net

    My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
    Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed